|
Celly222 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I dont trust these kinds of landings. Nothing beats the big ol' rubber superball method. If that carrier lets go of the lander just slightly too soon......... *smash* whereas with the superball you just let it bounce around. Phoenix lucked out i think. Spirit and Opportunity used the superball and ruled mars.
rdriedger (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
that landing gear almost seems excessivemuch awesome
MikeHawkins (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
JPL says due to delays it won't launch until Fall of 2009 but still arrive in 2010 just a few months later than originally planned. The die-hards Rovers still at it, one headed to a massive 14 mile wide crater 7 miles away...
subach (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
We're sending a robot with a laser to mars, the irony is so sweet I can taste it.
Pawalskij (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
that was fucking sweet
FlyUSNavy (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
its nuclear powered, no solar panels.
joachim2464 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
this will be a pretty big rover. But where are the solar panels?
Darealwhip (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
If NASA could assemble few more robots with off the shelf components in a modular fashion to simplify construction and cut cost. Also few robots could be just loaded with Image and sensing equipment.
Darealwhip (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I share you concern about cost...Lets you congresman know that this robots could be mass produce to slice cost in a half and get more robots on mars surface...
hfutrell (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
MSL hate rock! *zap* *zap* *zap*MSL strike fear in the heart of rock using LAZER! |