|
conodelamadreputa (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I think he would kill everyone, the bad players, the good players, the players that might defeat him, I think he would only let to live the ones that are amazing, yet not that amazing to defeat him XD
conodelamadreputa (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
2 things.1: Garry Kasparov's ego its INCREDIBLY BIG.2: I dont know how Topalov could hold the jumping and screaming I WON I WON! lol
orangelixir (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I agree with you on his English
inemtsev (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
This was just a one time event that Topalov one, I think in numerous tournaments Kasparov would destroy Topalov just as he would beat Kramnik.
ivikas123456789 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
let me translate:fisher is not the one.he doesn't want to play with karpov,still we don't know is fisher the best.karpov is a very good strong player.maybe he could beat fisher!fisher doesn't play chess too long,he has not play with too many strong c. players.In my opinion kasparov is now the best chess player on the world. I translate my slavic sentences too literaly to english so no one can understan what I'm trying to say.alright,I speak broken english too,and Im also a slav.
Mo0nLigh7 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
u r idiots1. Topalov2. Kasparov3. Anand
cognitivepawn (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
1. Fischer2. Tal3. Karpov
MrPewp (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Lol hes really good compared to me
BASIClvrCh8r (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I realise that English is probably not your first language, but your grammar is so bad that I cannot understand what you are trying to say.
schaperblaster (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Thats Kasparovs way of playing. his game is more of the psychological kind. He does that a lot. But he does it, knowing that some opponents might get influenced by it |