|
Hotshotter3000 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Walt Disney. You can criticize them all you want as a company, even the content of their films (even if it isn't their fault the stories are that way), but one thing you can't argue with is that the quality of their animation was, is, and always will be, amazing.
Danny77uk (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
More like a month.
KayoKsaKayo (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Wow, this shows how early CGI was, but the character animation was top notch.
tbrown8890 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
that was actually very unique in look...so different...I think it would be interesting to watch.
SexyGirlsSmoke (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
1983 man!
josswhedon692 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
this is offensively charmless
St4rdog (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Why wouldn't they have made this? I guess it's true that Eisner was an idiot. He would've had a say on this around that exact time.
nmitchell98405 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Wow..I did not know this technology was possible until Disney's "Beauty and the "Beast" was realeased...thanks for posting!
BlueDragon992 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
This how Disney SHOULD have done cgi animation!
Snurremegrundt (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
This was also an early example on digital coloring, which would later give rise to the famous CAPS system. But in the days when this test was made, it was not considred to be good enough. |
