ArrowHead83 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

"it is absolutely real.. even whole Police department converted all their car to run on water... i got proof.."Then show me.

ArrowHead83 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Sure, we can come up with methods that take less energy. But not less than the energy you get back when you burn the hydrogen. Energy doesn't just appear out of nowhere.

HOW2driveCARonWATER (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

it is absolutely real.. even whole Police department converted all their car to run on water... i got proof.. and I got full instruction how to modify any car to use water as fuel if anybody looking for! ★★★★★ stars for the vid!

Shiffy180 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

i think youre wrong. and even if you are right, i believe that we can come up with methods of electrolysis that take less energy. ive heard more professionals take the side that burning hydrogen produces more energy than separating water requires but i intend to look into it and ask my professors. i'd just like to keep an open (but optimistic) mind until i learn things like this for myself for sure.

ArrowHead83 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

"haha, water prices! nice one.so why dont all the car manufactures use this technology again?"Because it doesn't actually work. It's just a waste of gas. :D

ArrowHead83 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

I'm glad there are SOME people out there who can still think for themselves!

ArrowHead83 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

"just like a normal car where the running motor recharges the battery that it uses for ignition, the running motor in a water car recharges the battery that the car uses for electrolysis."But the energy gained from burning hydrogen is much less than the energy spent creating said hydrogen. It's a losing proposition.

ArrowHead83 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

"my god. of course it requires energy input. it runs on water."In the context of the operation of this system, WATER HAS NO ENERGY."it doesnt claim to be a perpetual motion machine. [...] not perpetual motion, just efficient. thats all it claims to be."Explicitly, sure, it doesn't claim to be a perpetual motion machine. But that's exactly what it would have to be (see above).

Shiffy180 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

my god. of course it requires energy input. it runs on water. it doesnt claim to be a perpetual motion machine. just like a normal car where the running motor recharges the battery that it uses for ignition, the running motor in a water car recharges the battery that the car uses for electrolysis. not perpetual motion, just efficient. thats all it claims to be.

yocbjone (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

haha, water prices! nice one.so why dont all the car manufactures use this technology again?